| ID | | Article Title | Post Date |
|
814 | 
| I'm getting low throughput on macOS. How can I fix this? | May-26-22 |
|
976 |
| In a Mac Pro, the SSDs are seen as external drives, how do I prevent accidental ejects? | Feb-14-23 |
|
1069 | 
| How do I configure RAID under Windows 10? | Feb-14-23 |
| 1. In the Windows search box, type "Storage Spaces".
2. Select Create a new pool and storage space. Windows will check all eligible volumes and list them in the next window.
3. Select the SSDs you want to include in the RAID and click Create Pool.
Warning: All data on the drives you select will be erased, so back up any important data before continuing!
4. After creating a pool, you'll be prompted to configure your new storage space. Type a name for the storage space and select a drive letter. The storage space will appear with this name and drive letter in Windows. You can select either the standard Windows NTFS file system or ReFS, the new resilient file system. If you'll be using mirroring or parity to protect against data loss, we recommend choosing ReFS for its file integrity protection features.
5. Choose a resiliency type. Select Simple (no resiliency) for a large RAID 0 pool of storage that combines the speed of the included SSDs, but offers no protection from a single SSD failure. Select Two-way mirror (RAID 1) to store two copies of your data across two SSDs, or select Three-way mirror (RAID 1) to store three copies of your data across three SSDs. Select Parity (RAID 5) to be protected from a single SSD failure across 4 SSDs. Parity will offer protection with increased size (3/4 of the combined SSD size), but a parity space is noticeably slower than the other options.
6. Choose the size of your storage space. The default will be the maximum available amount of storage you have, which will vary depending on the type of space you create. SImple maximum should be a sum of the sizes of the included SSDs. Mirror should should show the size of a single SSD. Parity should show the combined size of three (of four) SSDs.
7. Select Create storage space when you are done configuring your storage space.
8. The storage space you created will appear as a standard drive under This PC, with the name and drive letter you configured. It appears no different from a normal, physical drive to Windows and the desktop programs you use. |
| |
|
1073 |
| How do I configure RAID under macOS? | Feb-14-23 |
|
1077 |
| Programming SSDs to 4k Block Size for Compatibility With macOS 10.13.6 | Feb-08-23 |
|
1122 |
| Thunderbolt 3 NVMe volumes may experience a stop error under Windows 10 version 20H2 | Feb-14-23 |
| This is a Windows 10 known issue. It has been resolved in KB4586853 (OS Builds 19041.662 and 19042.662).
|
| |
|
1136 |
| How can I use my new SSD volume to hold my user folder on macOS? | Feb-14-23 |
| 1) Make a backup of the user folder
2) Copy the user folder to the SSD volume.
3) In System Preferences, open Users & Groups.
4) Unlock.
5) Right-Click on the user you moved to the SSD volume and select Advanced Options
6) Point the Home Directory to the user folder on the SSD volume. |
| |
|
1183 |
| The Write performance of my SSD is very slow under Windows. | Feb-14-23 |
|
1189 |
| The x8 PCIe lanes can deliver up to 7.8 GB/s. How do you fit the RAID, the 10gig lan and the 2x USB 3.2 in this bandwidth? | Jun-08-22 |
| The most important design feature is that every device is connected at its maximum PCIe 3.0 lanes: each SSD@x4; USB 3.2@x2; and 10GbE@x2, which gives each device its maximum usable bandwidth: SSD@3.5 GB/s x2; USB 3.2@1.0 GB/s x2; and 10GbE@1.0GB/s. Adding up the total bandwidth is indeed greater than 7.8GB/s, but considering that PCIe input and output bandwidth are independent, one can achieve the full 11MB/s bandwidth of simultaneous use of the devices as long as there is a mix of reading and writing. It is extremely unlikely that one would need to use all the ports simultaneously, at full bandwidth, and all writing-or all reading. The alternative of a larger PCIe bridge chip to connect to the computer at x16 would have increased the cost of the McFiver, without any performance gain in virtually any practical use scenario. |
| |
| |
